Skip to main content

Gender Equality

OYesterday I went to a talk on how to achieve Gender Equality by Prof. Iris Bohnet. I don't go to much of these and I was nervous as I took my boss along and it might not be great. I left with a page full of notes, wanting to tell everyone about what I just heard and my boss bought the book. Mission accomplished.
I never thought of my dad as a feminist, but I guess he was. I grew up wanting to be 'owner of Daddy's company' as in the boss and I never saw my gender as an impediment. Even though he imported construction machinery and there were no women in the business other than my mum, the assistants and the accountant, that never stroke me as much. When I gave him my grades, he always asked who had been better. At times I condemned him for it, but today I focus more on how gender agnostic he was. As I started looking for jobs he was keen to see me suceed and not settle for my first job (which I kind of did). He never took it that I would take anything else than the best for me. When my brother in law told him that I was going to work in the Barcelona of Investment Banking he rested I was ok to take it (Barcelona was at the top at the time). I went to football games as I grew up and had a real passion for it. Even though most of my friends did not I felt it as something special not just for me as a girl but as a father and daughter experience. Today I still go whenever I can even if he does not. 
Even though I am not here to talk about my dad but about the talk, my dad came to mind many times as I heard the talk so I could not avoid the interlude. 
The talk gave some well known examples of bias that we would swear we don't have. At Harvard, ai knew about the case study that has Heidi as a VC investors, and about how as an experiment the faculty changed the name of the protagonist for half the students. We are talking business school educated students. The name was Harry. Both were assessed as competent and successfull. But no one really wanted to work for or with Heidi, nobody liked her. Heidi did not fit the prototype. The experiment is mind boggling. 

Whilst you could talk for hours on unconscious bias, the talk was about how you design for success. The NY (i think) Orchestra started auditions behind a curtain to focus exclusively on the music, and the rates of acceptances for women shot up. And this dates back to the 70s or 80s. An insurance company has concluded that claims are lower if people sign in the begi ning of the form rather than the end. 
First, we talked about recruitment. The mere adjectives on the job description can determine the diversity of the applicants you get, so one can scan to remove them or make them inclusive. The interview process as pannel determines failure as people as a group in specific circumstances dont have the optimal outcome - is it the madness of crowds? Also, unstructured interviews make people less able to compare across candidates and look for someone that fits a role rather than for the best candidates. Structured interviews and forcing comparability of pre-defined attributes that are required for a role ensure a better processed. 
We talked about promotions: how self evaluations seen by managers before they do their own evaluations create a bias. And the difficulty of assessing someone's potential - needed as the world is not exclusively backward looking but dangerous as potential is easiest to fullfill through the use of a stereotype, 
She also talked about her studies of what works: diversity training? No evidence. Mentorship? Some evidence but only if it is long term and at significant investment by mentor and mentee. Most astonishing is the lack of metrics to know what works. If you give training to an already high potential female candidate to promotion and she gets promoted - are you really successfull? Would she have been promoted anyway? 

Prof. Iris also spent quite some time on design. Design at school and at work. Changing the SATs deduction for wrong questions mechanism increases the chance that women will answer all the questions and do better. Practically, it was not legal to the remaining risk averse 50% of the population to guess, rather than just the men. The design of groups as companies is also key to achieve results of diversity, not just of gender or race but also opinion. I was surprised that political correcteness improves the functioning of groups, but I guess I then understand the constant definition of the HBS classroom as a safe environment - one can test an idea without being ridiculed or subjected to a joke, it probably makes people say more than they would. It is hard to define norms for groups to operate without restricting how they operate to the point it is detrimental. I would like to know more about this. 

Next step: buy book and take practical steps to change now. We are all biased. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time is what makes us different

I heard what is likely to become one of my top 3 favourite quotes on a podcast on Friday. "Time is the only real democratic asset. We are all awarded the same time, it is what we do with it that distinguishes us".  Now, I recognise that most of us need to work with survive and that is not democratic throughout. But on an equal opportunity basis, this is an interesting way of putting it. For many years I did not understand why MS thought my resume was so interesting. In fact, they chased me during the entire recruitment process, even though I had no idea of moving to London or Finance. I wanted to be a consultant and stay in Lisbon forever. But traditional consultants in Portugal saw nothing in me, and MS did not let me go. When I started screening resumes and hiring people a couple of years later is when I understood why I was different. TIME.  I was truly different about what I did with my time. Not necessarily the basics - choice of degree or anything. But really ...

We are not afraid.. are we not?

I see signs saying we are not afraid. Londoners are tough and endured the bombings of WWII. But those Londoners are hardly the same as the ones here today. Yes people in general are resilient, more than we think we can be when looking outside out. That is anywhere in the world, not just in London. And truth be said there is merit in not letting fear control our lives and terrorism win.  Well I just walked into the district line, 5 stations away from Parsons Green and I am afraid. I am not shaking, crying or running away. But I am afraid mostly because it is all so natural. Life must go on I said, as I decided I was not going to cancel my lunch and avoid the tube. But that is what makes it scary. Life goes on and in an effort to not be afraid we recklessly do not change our habits and rely on the stats that more people die on the road then on terrorist attacks. Reality is, the law of probability does not matter because terrorist events are binary.  So I think about my frie...

Wonderful day

What a wonderful day. I am grateful for this newly found ability to enjoy my surroundings. As this was the second weekend in a roll that we were in Lisbon, the should word was quieter than usual and B triggered the crazy thought. Let's just stay home and do nothing! Wow - can we do that, are we allowed? More than allowed, we do that in London all the time and it is possibly one of my few fears if I ever move here - the inability to do what we want over what others want.  We gave it a go and i indulged into cooking us a proper lunch. As we sat  to do nothing after lunch I commented 'what a luxury'. I truly was not familiar with the concept. And even better family came to visit so we had the combination of both worlds. I ended a day with a friend over for dinner over a bottle of wine. I am grateful for all the little moments that filled my day. I am grateful I did so many things I love in a single day, without even expecting. Thank you.